Examining India’s Standpoint With Other Nations
India has launched the National Green Hydrogen Mission (NGHM) with an outlay of ₹19,744 crore (~$2.4 billion) to position itself as a global leader in green hydrogen production and export. Globally, however it seems that the US, EU, Gulf Nations & China are more aggressive when compared with India. The NGHM current outlay is likely to be short by nearly 75% (by 2030) if India wishes to compete globally and shall struggle to match China/Gulf in terms of exports. Although China has a funding allocation of US$ 6.7 Billion but their hydrogen production cost is far more competitive when compared with India. While evaluating India’s NGHM we have four key metric which shall present a clear picture of India’s standing when compared to the US, EU, Gulf & China. These metrics are listed as below:
- Global Green Hydrogen Investments Commitments
- Green Hydrogen Production Cost Breakdown (2030 Projections)
- Policy Support & Demand Drivers
- Key Challenges for India – For transforming into a global Hydrogen hub
India’s renewable energy costs are among the most competitive globally, positioning the country well for green hydrogen production. However, a key bottleneck remains: the high cost of electrolysers, where India significantly lags China. This gap limits India’s ability to fully capitalize on its renewable advantage and scale up green hydrogen production at globally competitive prices. In contrast, countries like Saudi Arabia and China are rapidly advancing in the green hydrogen space, largely due to strategic advantages. Both are leveraging state-backed capital and access to ultra-low-cost solar power—often close to zero marginal cost, which is expected to help them achieve hydrogen production costs of less than $1 per kilogram soon. This cost benchmark, considered a tipping point for green hydrogen competitiveness, gives these nations a dominant position in the global hydrogen economy. If India aims to compete, strategic interventions will be essential ranging from scaling domestic Electrolyser manufacturing and investing in R&D to establishing favorable policy frameworks and securing long-term funding support.
India is projected to witness strong domestic demand for green hydrogen, estimated at around 5 million metric tons (MMT) by 2030. This demand presents a significant opportunity to decarbonize hard-to-abate sectors such as steel, refining, and fertilizers. However, while India is gearing up for large-scale production, its export infrastructure remains underdeveloped compared to Gulf nations and China, both of which are rapidly building export-focused hydrogen value chains. Moreover, global competition is intensifying due to aggressive subsidy regimes. The U.S. and the EU are offering generous incentives—ranging from $3 to $4 per kg of green hydrogen—which dramatically lower production costs and make exports viable. In contrast, India’s current support mechanisms are modest, offering only around $0.3 to $0.5 per kg. This disparity puts Indian producers at a disadvantage in the global market and could hinder India’s ambitions to become a major hydrogen export hub. To remain competitive, India must accelerate infrastructure development, enhance financial support, and facilitate long-term offtake arrangements.
Source: eninrac consulting
Is India’s financial commitment overshadowed by that of developed economies? Does India fall short in terms of subsidy support?
Despite its strong ambition, India’s green hydrogen funding remains modest compared to global peers. Under the National Green Hydrogen Mission, India has committed ₹19,744 crore (~$2.4B)—which is 5–20 times lower than what the US, EU, and Gulf nations have pledged. For comparison:
- USA: $13.5B via Inflation Reduction Act subsidies ($3/kg H₂ tax credit)
- EU: $5.2B through Carbon Contracts for Difference (CCfD) and REPowerEU
- Gulf (Saudi/UAE): Over $50B in mega-projects (NEOM, ADNOC, Masdar)
- China: $6.7B in state-led electrolyser investments
India also lags in subsidy depth. While the US and EU offer ~$3–4/kg incentives, India’s support stands at just $0.3–0.5/kg far too low to attract global capital or match production costs abroad. As a result, India’s hydrogen cost ($1.5–2.0/kg) is nearly double that of Saudi Arabia or China (<$1/kg), with heavy dependence on imported electrolysers inflating costs further.
Export competitiveness is also at risk. Gulf nations are signing offtake deals with EU and Asia, while Australia and Oman are moving ahead with ammonia export infrastructure leaving India behind due to underdeveloped ports and lack of binding agreements. Investor confidence reflects this gap - Only 5% of Indian green H₂ projects have secured financing, compared to over 60% in the US and EU.
Source: eninrac consulting
For any latest updates on regulations and policies, visit Omnicore
For any updates on energy and infrastructure sectors, visit Einfews
