Array
(
[0] => stdClass Object
(
[id] => 73
[user_id] => 12
[title] => TBCB Guidelines For Procurement Of Storage Capacity
[content] =>
TBCB GUIDELINES FOR PROCUREMENT OF STORAGE CAPACITY – INDIA
Analysis of Ministry of Power Resolution of TBCB Guidelines for Procurement Storage Capacity & Stored Energy
from PHSP
DESCRIPTION OF THE RESOLUTION
Tariff-Based Competitive Bidding Guidelines for the procurement of storage capacity or stored energy from Pumped
Storage Plants (PSPs), issued by the Ministry of Power (MoP), India aims to support India's energy transition by
enhancing grid stability, integrating renewable energy sources, and reducing peak-time electricity costs. The
guidelines establish a transparent, standardized framework for procurement, ensuring fair risk-sharing among
stakeholders, including developers, procurers, financial institutions, and regulatory bodies.
Key provisions include bidding structures, financial eligibility criteria, performance guarantees, and contract
terms. The document also outlines the technical requirements, project timelines, and tariff structures for PSP
development. Additionally, it highlights environmental considerations, land acquisition policies, and social
impact assessments. By defining clear regulatory processes and dispute resolution mechanisms, these guidelines aim
to attract investment, improve energy security, and drive long-term sustainability in India's evolving power
sector.
The policy supports the National Electricity Plan 2023, which projects a need for 27 GW of PSP capacity by
2031-32. It enables cost-effective peak load management, reduces carbon emissions, and encourages public-private
partnerships (PPPs) to accelerate storage infrastructure development while balancing economic and environmental
factors.
ENERGY FLOW & ECONOMIC BENEFITS OF PHSPs
FINANCIAL FLOW & INVESTMENT REQUIREMENT - PHSP
The policy supports the National Electricity Plan 2023, which projects a need for 27 GW of PSP capacity by
2031-32. It enables cost-effective peak load management, reduces carbon emissions, and encourages public-private
partnerships (PPPs) to accelerate storage infrastructure development.
ENVIRONMENT & SOCIAL IMPACT
KEY IMPACTS
Pumped Storage Plants (PSPs) play a crucial role in reducing carbon emissions by
integrating renewable energy and minimizing reliance on fossil-fuel-based power generation. However, their
development comes with environmental and social considerations.
PSPs require large reservoirs, which can lead to land acquisition challenges,
deforestation, and ecosystem disturbances. Water resource management is a key concern, as PSPs may alter river
flows and affect aquatic biodiversity. Additionally, local communities near project sites may face
displacement and livelihood disruptions, necessitating resettlement plans and fair compensation.
To mitigate these impacts, PSP projects must undergo environmental impact
assessments (EIA), adhere to sustainability guidelines, and implement afforestation programs. Proper
stakeholder engagement and community development initiatives are essential to balancing economic benefits with
ecological and social responsibility.
[slug] => tbcb-guidelines-for-procurement-of-storage-capacity
[created_at] => 2025-02-17 04:45:47
[update_at] => 2025-02-20 04:45:47
[count] => 0
[post_object] => {"brief":"Tariff-Based Competitive Bidding Guidelines for the procurement of storage capacity or stored energy from Pumped Storage Plants (PSPs), issued by the Ministry of Power (MoP), India aims to support India's energy transition by enhancing grid stability, integrating renewable energy sources, and reducing peak-time electricity costs. The guidelines establish a transparent, standardized framework for procurement, ensuring fair risk-sharing among stakeholders, including developers, procurers, financial institutions, and regulatory bodies.\n","metaTitle":"TBCB Guidelines For Procurement Of Storage Capacity","metaDescription":"Tariff-Based Competitive Bidding Guidelines for the procurement of storage capacity or stored energy from Pumped Storage Plants (PSPs)","attachment":"picture11.jpg","author":["1","2"],"support_author":["1","2"]}
[type] => the-c-suite-intelligence
[status] => 1
[approve] => 1
)
[1] => stdClass Object
(
[id] => 25
[user_id] => 12
[title] => CERC DSM 2024: Suo-Motu Order on Recovery of Legacy Dues and Its Impact on Discoms and Ancillary Services
[content] =>
Eninrac’s insights upon Recovery of legacy dues in the Deviation Settlement Mechanism (DSM) Pool Account in pursuance of DSM Regulations, 2024. NLDC’s communication reflects ambiguity in the minds of some of the discoms about the order dated 15.10.2024 of the Commission approving the detailed procedure for recovery of charges in case of deficit in the DSM Pool Account. For the sake of clarity and to ensure timely payment of the DSM dues, the Commission clarifies that the methodology approved in the detailed procedure vide the Order dated 15.10.2024 is applicable for recovery of charges in case of the deficits in the DSM Pool Account "as on and from 16th September 2024."
Eninrac Insights: Non-Payment of Dues and Its Impact on Ancillary Service Providers
1. Ancillary Service Providers:
• Delayed Payments: The non-payment of dues directly leads to delays in compensating ancillary service providers, potentially creating financial stress for entities reliant on timely payments for operational continuity.
• Erosion of Trust: Persistent delays may reduce trust in the regulatory framework and discourage ancillary service providers from actively participating in the grid security market.
• Reduced Capacity for Services: Financial uncertainty could limit the ability of ancillary service providers to maintain or scale their operations, affecting their capability to support grid stability during high-demand periods.
2. Grid Reliability and Security:
• Operational Risks: Ancillary service providers play a critical role in managing grid deviations and ensuring stability. Any financial disincentive may result in fewer ancillary services being available, increasing the risk of grid instability.
• Emergency Preparedness: In times of peak demand or unexpected outages, the lack of robust ancillary service support could jeopardize emergency response capabilities.
3. Consumers:
• Service Reliability: A shortage of ancillary services may lead to more frequent and prolonged outages, impacting industries, households, and essential services.
• Economic Impact: Industries reliant on consistent electricity supply may face operational disruptions, indirectly affecting employment and economic productivity.
4. Distribution Companies (Discoms):
• Operational Challenges: Discoms might face reputational and operational issues if ancillary service providers refuse or limit their services due to delayed payments.
• Increased Costs: Discoms may need to resort to more expensive alternatives to manage grid deviations, further straining their financial resources.
5. Regulatory Framework:
Cascading Deficit Issues: Non-payment of dues creates a feedback loop of financial stress, undermining the stability of the DSM Pool Account and necessitating additional interventions from CERC.
[slug] => cerc-dsm-2024-suo-motu-order-recovery-legacy-dues-discoms-ancillary-services
[created_at] => 2025-01-09 12:53:03
[update_at] => 2025-01-13 12:53:03
[count] => 0
[post_object] => {"brief":"Eninrac\u2019s insights upon Recovery of legacy dues in the Deviation Settlement Mechanism (DSM) Pool Account in pursuance of DSM Regulations, 2024. NLDC\u2019s communication reflects ambiguity in the minds of some of the discoms about the order dated 15.10.2024","metaTitle":"Eninrac\u2019s insights upon Recovery of legacy dues in the Devia","metaDescription":"Eninrac\u2019s insights upon Recovery of legacy dues in the Deviation Settlement Mechanism (DSM) Pool Account in pursuance of DSM Regulations, 2024. NLDC\u2019s","attachment":"powertower-unsplash-1-.jpg","author":["1"],"support_author":["1","12"]}
[type] => the-c-suite-intelligence
[status] => 1
[approve] => 1
)
[2] => stdClass Object
(
[id] => 27
[user_id] => 12
[title] => 2024 CERC Cross-Border Trade Amendments: Key Impacts on India’s Electricity Sector and Stakeholders
[content] =>
Eninrac Insight: Analysing the impacts of the provided order (Petition No.
11/SM/2024) dated 22nd December 2024, by the Central Electricity Regulatory
Commission (CERC) involves understanding the broader consequences on various
stakeholders involved in the electricity generation and distribution
ecosystem. The impact upon each stakeholder is enlisted as under:
Stakeholders Impact Analysis:
-
Renewable Power Developers (RPDs):
-
Clarity in Scheduling Modalities: The explicit provision for
scheduling infirm power provides much-needed regulatory certainty,
enabling better planning for testing, commissioning, and pre-COD
injections.
-
Flexibility in Trial Runs: The relaxation on the number of
trial run instalments for larger capacity projects (250 MW+) reduces
logistical and operational pressures, facilitating smoother
transitions.
-
Market Opportunities: The ability to sell power post-successful
trial operation after offering it to contracted beneficiaries opens
revenue streams for developers.
-
Regulatory Compliance Costs: Compliance with detailed technical
standards (e.g., CEA connectivity standards) and requirements for
trial run certification may increase administrative and operational
expenses.
-
Grid Operators (NLDCs, RLDCs)
-
Operational Oversight: Clear guidelines for scheduling infirm
power pre-COD help RLDCs ensure grid stability, balancing injections
during testing phases.
-
Data Management: Increased administrative tasks to maintain
detailed records of infirm power injections and associated pre-COD
activities.
-
Coordination Demands: Greater interaction with developers and
intermediary procurers for certification and scheduling.
-
Beneficiaries (Discoms, Procurers):
-
First Refusal Rights: Beneficiaries gain priority access to
power post-trial runs, ensuring contracted obligations are met.
-
Supply Assurance: Provisions ensure power availability during
the pre-COD phase for procurers relying on RE developers.
-
Potential Cost Variations: The inability to respond within
stipulated timelines may lead to opportunity losses, as developers
could sell power in the market.
-
Consumers:
-
Grid Stability Benefits: Improved regulatory mechanisms for
scheduling and testing enhance overall grid reliability, indirectly
benefiting end consumers through fewer disruptions.
-
Long-term Cost Benefits: Streamlined processes for integrating
RE into the grid can reduce the cost of renewable energy adoption over
time.
-
Regulators:
-
Alignment with Energy Goals: The provisions support India’s
renewable energy targets, ensuring a smoother integration of RE into
the energy mix.
-
Policy Iteration Needs: Regular updates to the Grid Code to
address operational challenges may require continuous engagement with
stakeholders.
Broader Implications:
-
Market Dynamics:
-
Encourages investment in large-scale renewable projects by ensuring
operational and financial predictability for developers.
-
Strengthens the ancillary services market as developers utilize
bilateral contracts or market mechanisms like I-DAM/HP-DAM.
-
Environmental Impact:
-
Accelerates the transition to renewables by simplifying processes for
developers, reducing dependence on fossil fuels, and promoting clean
energy solutions.
-
Economic Impact:
-
Enhanced RE integration supports economic growth through job creation
in commissioning, operations, and grid management.
-
Potential reduction in system costs from improved grid stability and
optimized resource utilization.
-
Consumers:
-
Grid Stability Benefits: Improved regulatory mechanisms for scheduling
and testing enhance overall grid reliability, indirectly benefiting
end consumers through fewer disruptions.
-
Long-term Cost Benefits: Streamlined processes for integrating RE into
the grid can reduce the cost of renewable energy adoption over time.
-
Challenges:
-
Enforcement and monitoring of compliance with technical and scheduling
norms could pose challenges for RLDCs and regulatory bodies.
-
Delays in amendment processes for Grid Code updates might create
temporary ambiguities.
[slug] => 2024-cerc-cross-border-trade-amendments-india-electricity-sector-impacts
[created_at] => 2024-12-30 10:40:46
[update_at] => 2025-01-13 10:40:46
[count] => 0
[post_object] => {"brief":"Eninrac Insight: Analysing the impacts of the provided order (Petition No. 11\/SM\/2024) dated 22nd December 2024, by the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (CERC) involves understanding the broader consequences on various stakeholders involved in the electricity generation and distribution ecosystem. The impact upon each stakeholder is enlisted","metaTitle":"Eninrac Insight: Analysing the impacts of the provided order","metaDescription":"Eninrac Insight: Analysing the impacts of the provided order (Petition No. 11\/SM\/2024) dated 22nd December 2024, by the CERC","attachment":"herc-updates9-2-.jpg","author":["1"],"support_author":["1"]}
[type] => the-c-suite-intelligence
[status] => 1
[approve] => 1
)
)